Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +45%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy