Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro W2100

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 159% (1762MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +522%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

727 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy