NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+1779%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Dec 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
12
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G94B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
