Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +111%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy