NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2040MHz vs 1762MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
+15%
3.133 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
