Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1762MHz vs 1470MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +150%
6.774 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

727 MHz
Base Clock
1042 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
18
768
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
72
6
RT Cores
18
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy