Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (1762MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +42%
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Feb 2014
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy