Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W6150M

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 Max Q +764%
14.28 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
352.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
223.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
14.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
223.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy