Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H +482%
19.17 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
1792
192
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
Tonga
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy