Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1215MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
14.31 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +3%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
8192
184
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy