Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +1220%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
768
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy