Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +3290%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
4
5888
Shading Units
192
184
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net