Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +5180%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
192
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy