NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2844%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
8
5888
Shading Units
256
184
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
