NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+32422%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
2
5888
Shading Units
16
184
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
