Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
5840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +12236%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
6
5888
Shading Units
48
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy