Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +4289%
14.31 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
192
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy