CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
VS
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1852%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
VS
Quadro K2000
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
384
184
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
2
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
3
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
4
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
5
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
6
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
7
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
8
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
9
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s
10
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy