Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +1852%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
384
184
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy