Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
VS
NVIDIA Tesla K20s
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
NVIDIA Tesla K20s
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20s to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +398%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla K20s
2.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
2496
184
TMUs
208
96
ROPs
40
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.90 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.6 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.870 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
956.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy