NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+49244%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
2
5888
Shading Units
16
184
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
