NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile

VS

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 16GB VRAM RTX A5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages

Released 11 months late

Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1575MHz vs 1215MHz)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)

256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX A4500 Embedded

14.31 TFLOPS

RTX A5000 Mobile +35%

19.35 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX A4500 Embedded +38%

4164

RTX A5000 Mobile

3001

OctaneBench

RTX A4500 Embedded +59%

485

RTX A5000 Mobile

305

RTX A4500 Embedded

VS

RTX A5000 Mobile

Graphics Card

Mar 2022

Release Date

Apr 2021

Quadro Ampere-M

Generation

Quadro Ampere-M

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz

Base Clock

900 MHz

1215 MHz

Boost Clock

1575 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

256bit

384.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

46

SM Count

48

-

Compute Units

-

5888

Shading Units

6144

184

TMUs

192

96

ROPs

96

184

Tensor Cores

192

46

RT Cores

48

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

151.2 GPixel/s

223.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

302.4 GTexel/s

14.31 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

19.35 TFLOPS

14.31 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

19.35 TFLOPS

223.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

302.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104

GPU Name

GA104

-

GPU Variant

-

Ampere

Architecture

Ampere

Samsung

Foundry

Samsung

8 nm

Process Size

8 nm

17.4 billion

Transistors

17.4 billion

392 mm²

Die Size

392 mm²

Board Design

80W

TDP

150W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.6

CUDA

8.6

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

2

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

3

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

4

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla D870

5

NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

6

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

7

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

8

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q

9

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla M10

10

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD