Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +11167%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
48
184
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy