CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
VS
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
5440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1292%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
VS
Tesla S2050
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
448
184
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
2
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
3
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
4
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
5
NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
6
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
7
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
8
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
9
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
10
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy