Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +525%
14.31 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
1536
184
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy