Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1395MHz vs 1215MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +11%
14.31 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
72
5888
Shading Units
4608
184
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
184
Tensor Cores
576
46
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy