Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +2401%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
384
184
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy