Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1291MHz vs 1215MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +381%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
9
5888
Shading Units
1152
184
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy