Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile +9934%
17.66 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
8
5888
Shading Units
64
184
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
12
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

140W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy