Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile +67823%
17.66 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
2
5888
Shading Units
16
184
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

140W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy