NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile
+1225%
17.66 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
16
5888
Shading Units
512
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
