NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile
+348%
17.66 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A4500 Mobile
+619%
2676
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Mobile
+426%
332
Tesla K20Xm
63
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
2688
184
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
