Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +138%
5.468 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy