Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +1165%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
5
2048
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy