Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1335MHz vs 1163MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +206%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy