Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1354MHz vs 1335MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +294%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded +103%
2628
Quadro P620
1294

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net