NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1537MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
+512%
6.296 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
832 MHz
Base Clock
-
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
