Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A5000 8Q and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5000 8Q +5080%
27.77 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1170 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
64
SM Count
27
8192
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
256
Tensor Cores
-
64
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
433.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
27.77 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
27.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
433.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy