NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5000 Mobile
+28780%
19.35 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1575 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
151.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
302.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
19.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
302.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
