Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1260MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +426%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
2304
232
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net