Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
7408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +76693%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
2
7424
Shading Units
16
232
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy