NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile
+465%
22.27 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A5500 Mobile
+798%
3342
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
RTX A5500 Mobile
+517%
389
Tesla K20Xm
63
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
2688
232
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
