Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
10208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +34344%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
4
10240
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy