Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +3045%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
10240
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy