Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +117486%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
2
10240
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy