NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
10208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+45981%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
4
10240
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
230W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
