Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
10208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +57696%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
4
10240
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy