Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (896.0GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1680MHz vs 1500MHz)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile
23.04 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+41%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
Blackwell-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
896.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
60
SM Count
76
7680
Shading Units
9728
240
TMUs
304
96
ROPs
112
240
Tensor Cores
304
60
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GB203
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
45.6 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
378 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
10.1
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
