Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM T1000 8 GB and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T1000 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1395MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T1000 8 GB +31%
2.5 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Feb 2014
Quadro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy