NVIDIA T1000 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
+5%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro Turing
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1600
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
