NVIDIA T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1395MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T1000
+36%
2.5 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Blender
T1000
+113%
383
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
OctaneBench
T1000
+61%
71
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
44
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Turing
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
